Comments on: The Judge Sentenced Michael Vick To WHAT?!?! http://www.sportaphile.com/2007/12/10/the-judge-sentenced-michael-vick-to-what/ Never Has A Site Paid So Much Attention To Serena Williams' Booty Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:50:04 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Scott http://www.sportaphile.com/2007/12/10/the-judge-sentenced-michael-vick-to-what/comment-page-1/#comment-483 Scott Sat, 15 Dec 2007 21:12:38 +0000 http://www.sportaphile.com/2007/12/10/the-judge-sentenced-michael-vick-to-what/#comment-483 "Shooting her abusive husband = justifiable." HAHAHAHA!!! ROFL LMAO You're FUCKING RETARDED!! “Shooting her abusive husband = justifiable.”

HAHAHAHA!!! ROFL LMAO

You’re FUCKING RETARDED!!

]]> By: Admin http://www.sportaphile.com/2007/12/10/the-judge-sentenced-michael-vick-to-what/comment-page-1/#comment-479 Admin Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:06:11 +0000 http://www.sportaphile.com/2007/12/10/the-judge-sentenced-michael-vick-to-what/#comment-479 Shooting someone in the back while they sleep is NOT justifiable homicide. I'm laughing so hard right now... it really does me no good to continue entertaining this argument with you. Have a nice day man... Shooting someone in the back while they sleep is NOT justifiable homicide.

I’m laughing so hard right now… it really does me no good to continue entertaining this argument with you. Have a nice day man…

]]> By: eg821 http://www.sportaphile.com/2007/12/10/the-judge-sentenced-michael-vick-to-what/comment-page-1/#comment-478 eg821 Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:54:42 +0000 http://www.sportaphile.com/2007/12/10/the-judge-sentenced-michael-vick-to-what/#comment-478 Shooting her abusive husband = justifiable. Maliciously and wantonly torturing animals for mere pleasure = not justifiable. Translation: Get your specist head out of your ass, grow a brain, and learn how to think. Shooting her abusive husband = justifiable.

Maliciously and wantonly torturing animals for mere pleasure = not justifiable.

Translation: Get your specist head out of your ass, grow a brain, and learn how to think.

]]> By: Admin http://www.sportaphile.com/2007/12/10/the-judge-sentenced-michael-vick-to-what/comment-page-1/#comment-477 Admin Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:47:15 +0000 http://www.sportaphile.com/2007/12/10/the-judge-sentenced-michael-vick-to-what/#comment-477 Upset? ... Not Quite. If you stopped taking me serious the moment you "thought" i played the race card, then i definitely stopped taking you serious the moment you defended a woman who intentionally shot and killed her husband. It's all comic relief at this point,. Upset? … Not Quite.

If you stopped taking me serious the moment you “thought” i played the race card, then i definitely stopped taking you serious the moment you defended a woman who intentionally shot and killed her husband.

It’s all comic relief at this point,.

]]> By: eg821 http://www.sportaphile.com/2007/12/10/the-judge-sentenced-michael-vick-to-what/comment-page-1/#comment-476 eg821 Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:38:17 +0000 http://www.sportaphile.com/2007/12/10/the-judge-sentenced-michael-vick-to-what/#comment-476 And I understand that you're upset because I called you out on your stunning lack of knowledge of both cases you mentioned. And I understand that you’re upset because I called you out on your stunning lack of knowledge of both cases you mentioned.

]]> By: eg821 http://www.sportaphile.com/2007/12/10/the-judge-sentenced-michael-vick-to-what/comment-page-1/#comment-475 eg821 Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:36:32 +0000 http://www.sportaphile.com/2007/12/10/the-judge-sentenced-michael-vick-to-what/#comment-475 Yes. Because they weren't innocent. One was abusive, the other was a golddigger. By their actions they have made themselves worthless. I don't believe that human beings are automatically more valuable than animals. They have to earn it. Part of earning it is by causing no harm, lest they get it back in return. Yes. Because they weren’t innocent. One was abusive, the other was a golddigger. By their actions they have made themselves worthless.

I don’t believe that human beings are automatically more valuable than animals. They have to earn it. Part of earning it is by causing no harm, lest they get it back in return.

]]> By: Admin http://www.sportaphile.com/2007/12/10/the-judge-sentenced-michael-vick-to-what/comment-page-1/#comment-474 Admin Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:10:51 +0000 http://www.sportaphile.com/2007/12/10/the-judge-sentenced-michael-vick-to-what/#comment-474 Are you serious!!!!! If Mary Winklers husband was abusive, she should have LEFT HIM. You cant just go around killing *people* because you think they had it coming. So both victims deserved it? LMAO Get out of here.... seriously..... Are you serious!!!!! If Mary Winklers husband was abusive, she should have LEFT HIM. You cant just go around killing *people* because you think they had it coming.

So both victims deserved it? LMAO

Get out of here…. seriously…..

]]> By: eg821 http://www.sportaphile.com/2007/12/10/the-judge-sentenced-michael-vick-to-what/comment-page-1/#comment-473 eg821 Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:55:13 +0000 http://www.sportaphile.com/2007/12/10/the-judge-sentenced-michael-vick-to-what/#comment-473 Mary Winkler's husband was an abusive piece of crap. Bet that doesn't matter, does it? And, quite frankly, the woman Marv Albert "assaulted" had it coming. And her evidence was not enough to press a sodomy or felony sexual assault charge. It was very much a he-said, she-said deal. Your knowledge of the Albert case is rudimentary, at best. I'd argue both of the human beings "victimized" in those cases were worth less than the dogs Vick tortured. Mary Winkler’s husband was an abusive piece of crap. Bet that doesn’t matter, does it?

And, quite frankly, the woman Marv Albert “assaulted” had it coming. And her evidence was not enough to press a sodomy or felony sexual assault charge. It was very much a he-said, she-said deal. Your knowledge of the Albert case is rudimentary, at best.

I’d argue both of the human beings “victimized” in those cases were worth less than the dogs Vick tortured.

]]> By: Admin http://www.sportaphile.com/2007/12/10/the-judge-sentenced-michael-vick-to-what/comment-page-1/#comment-472 Admin Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:45:25 +0000 http://www.sportaphile.com/2007/12/10/the-judge-sentenced-michael-vick-to-what/#comment-472 It kills me when people really act like they gave a damn about those pit bulls. 23 months and tens of millions of dollars is extremely excessive for dogs. While I don't like or agree with what he did to them.... I do not hold animals in the same regards as I do human beings. It kills me when people really act like they gave a damn about those pit bulls.

23 months and tens of millions of dollars is extremely excessive for dogs.

While I don’t like or agree with what he did to them…. I do not hold animals in the same regards as I do human beings.

]]> By: eg821 http://www.sportaphile.com/2007/12/10/the-judge-sentenced-michael-vick-to-what/comment-page-1/#comment-471 eg821 Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:27:59 +0000 http://www.sportaphile.com/2007/12/10/the-judge-sentenced-michael-vick-to-what/#comment-471 You, sir, are a moron. 23 months, 18 for good behavior -- in minimum security, no less -- how the hell is that excessive for what he did? I think he deserves 23 years in Supermax. And "legal lynching" smacks of a racism accusation, which immediately makes me dismiss what you had to say. You, sir, are a moron. 23 months, 18 for good behavior — in minimum security, no less — how the hell is that excessive for what he did? I think he deserves 23 years in Supermax.

And “legal lynching” smacks of a racism accusation, which immediately makes me dismiss what you had to say.

]]>